Josh's blog

Thursday, October 27, 2005

Recycle this! Post, consumer.

Its my turn to whine so get on the bandwagon or I might be throwing some nasty looks your way mister. (or ma'am) What? "It's Miss" No, "Miz" - Not married huh? Whoudah thought...


Recycling Types, Number 8 - blogA lot of this stuff out here in the blogosphere is just recycled, if it is on one blog it's probably on another. I know quite a bit on this blog can definitely be found somewhere else on the web. I think that in most cases though, it's good to repeat it - it gives weight to what is being talked about in real life. It clues the search engines in to what is news, what is a hot topic or trend and who is talking about this stuff. I repeat things I think are worth repeating, not because I just want to have that content on my site, but to let those of you who haven't heard the news know about this, that, or the other thing. So I guess I'm all for recycling. Then again...
Maybe I'm not... Aluminum Cans for Burned Children Collection boxWhen I first started my current job I started a recycling "thing" for all the pop cans at work. My company has a refrigerator on each floor, and they're always stocked with all kinds of pop and juice, free of charge to the employees. A nice little perk. For some reason I started thinking about all the pop cans that were being thrown away and I thought I should do something about it. So I did. When I was in college, all over campus were these cardboard boxes and I though we should have a couple in the office. A nice way to get people to recycle and for a good cause. So I called the fire department - no I didn't dial 911. That would have been fun...
911 Operator: 911 Akron. Me: Oh my, you have to help me... 911 Operator: What's your emergency sir? Me: Cans! They're all over the place. 911 Operator: Cans? What kind of cans sir? Me: You know like aluminum ones - 911 Operator: Are there explosives in the cans sir? Me: What? 911 Operator: Explosives, in the cans? Me: I supposed they could explode but, no - not the ones I'm worried about. 911 Operator: What is the situation then? Me: -- 911 Operator: Sir? Me: THERE'S NO RECYCLING PROGRAM AT MY OFFICE!!!
But no, I just called the non-emergency number and asked to speak with someone about the Aluminum Cans for Burned Children program. They transferred me to somebody and the next day, a guy shows up with 6 collection boxes and 12 bags. That was about 3 years ago. Since then I've come to realize that I don't care about recycling aluminum cans. At all. For some reason I still do it though.
Smoking... Besides being an unhealthy habit, I think smoking labels you as a dirty person. Watch out - I'm using a broad brush here. Anyway, why do smokers think the world is their ashtray? Or my sidewalk, or right outside the doors of my office? And most recently I've come up with another question about smoking? Why is smoking allowed in places where food is sold, especially when the food is sitting out - more specifically donut shops? On Sunday morning, Jeff and I went out to get donuts a very normal thing to do on a Sunday. (Oh, I forgot to mention, we spent the weekend in Columbus.) So we jump in Ferguson and head down to Jelly Donuts - we should have turned around and left the moment we opened the door. The stench of probably about 20+ years of cigarette smoke rushed at us as we made our entry. We stepped up to the counter, placed our order and got the heck out of there. But Jelly Donuts came with us. You see, it was a cool morning and Jeff & I were both wearing warmer clothing that sucked up the smoke. We drove with the windows open and sprayed ourselves with Febreeze when we arrived at home. We smelled like chain smokers - but that isn't the bad part. It was the donuts - they tasted like cigarettes. I know for some smokers that seems like a tasty idea, but for those of us that aren't used to inhaling this stuff it really is pretty nasty. So we called up Jelly Donuts and told them the deal, they said bring them back and we could get our money back. No problem. Jeff made the call - he said the guy sounded like this happens all the time. I imagine it would. When we went back we went through the drive-thru. We pulled up to the window and sat the box down - they have one of those windows that spins around so it's never really "open." When they spun the window and pulled the box of donuts inside, the stench trapped in the window escaped - right into my face.
Loud Singers in Church I honestly believe that you can't fall into this category without knowing it. I'm all for singing at a normal volume - it has taken me the better part of my life to become comfortable enough to sing at a level that I know others around me can hear. But singing during worship isn't a solo act - and some people sing so loud that I can't hear myself. And I'm not just talking about people with "bad" singing voices either - that I think you can honestly not know about yourself. Especially if you hang out with a lot of nice people who just don't want to be mean, or maybe they all are really mean and enjoy making fun of you behind your back about how you sound like a drowning goat when you rock out to N'Sync. I don't care if you're Amy Grant or Larnell Harris, when you're not in the front, sing with the congregation. If you want to be lead vocalist try out for the worship band - and no, the worship service is not a try out. If you want to sing all the "extra" stuff, do it quietly - from the back. I don't mind if you sing that stuff - I just prefer that you do that stuff in your car, with your windows up. And quit harmonizing - you're making the angels cry. Or at least they will after I think about what I'd like to do to get you to sing the right way.
Old people... Not that there have been that many that have annoyed me lately but they use funny words or phrases. At least my wife thinks they do. And if I ever use one of them she gives me grief about it. One time I said "She's stirred up a hornets nest" Kirsten was like - Alright Old Man! One thing that did bug me the other day - I was at Target, I had to get like one thing and I got in the shortest line available. This old lady was just finishing up - at least it looked like it when I was looking around for a quick escape. I got in line, put my whatever it was on the conveyor and looked up when I heard the old lady ask if Target accepted personal checks. The cashier said yes and the woman began to write out her check. I swear it wasn't any less than 40 seconds later I look over to check the progress - she was just writing the last "t" in Target. Then she made a big sweeping line after that - as if someone in the course of the next 30 minutes it would take for her to finish the check, would run up and grab it hoping to add their last name and try and cash it in at the bank.
Honestly, my name is Target Jones, Target Reginald Jones.
Anyway, she finally finishes and tears it from the book, but it's one of those duplicate check books with the 1970's technology of carbon paper - she of course tore that out as well and before she hands the check to the cashier, has to figure out what to do with this unexpected turn of events. Finally she gets that squared away and 3 attempts on that check checker thing and the old bag is out of my way. I wish we could force them to adopt technology, we could give them options - like adapt or be fed to zoo animals. It is high time we did something about these old-fangled people.

10 Comments:

  • Re: Smoking

    It is a dirty habit for dirty birds. I hate smoking. In California, we have one, big sweeping law: no smoking inside public establishments. Boom. Done. It's fantastic. No "smoking or non?" when you walk into a restaurant. Everything's non. I can't describe how beautiful it is.

    And I'll tell you what else I hate: comedians that rail against people that hate smokers: "He's like, 'y'know, smoking causes cancer' and I'm like, 'yeah, moron, I know that, puff-puff-puff.' It's my right as an American to kill myself slowly, so leave me alone!"

    Yeah, and it's my right to ostracize you for having a habit that makes you look like a lab chimp. Attention smokers: I don't like you. I don't like your litter and I don't like riding in your car. I don't like the thin yellow film that coats everything you own. I don't like the fact that my wife won't let me touch her after I've spent time hanging out at your house. Can't you ditch the cigs and fill the void with a porn addiction like everyone else?

    Smoking. Bleugh. At least it's less disgusting than dipping.
    ---

    Re: Old People

    Man, I don't know. All of your points are valid and I sympathize, but there's something within me that can't bring myself to complain about the elderly. I think it's a warped sort of karmic terror: Old age is inevitable and that's if you're lucky.

    Carey and I were discussing the reality of our minds and health going down the toilet one day. She thinks she'll stay sharp for the rest of her life. She assumes she'll be lucid and sweet on her deathbed. Well, if anyone can pull that off, it's Carey, but I have no such illusions about myself. I welcome the coming dementia.

    My grandfather spent the final years of his life trying to build a homemade refrigerator in his basement, driving on sidewalks and talking to dead people that weren't there. "Poor grandpa?" Poor nothing! Dude was awesome!

    Old age is a license to lose it. I can't wait.

    By Blogger Jeremy Bear, at 7:07 PM, November 07, 2005  

  • Josh,

    I agree, people shouldn't try to harmonize when they sing in church.

    I think my latest pet peeve is when the worship leader starts singing harmony. It throws everyone off. I should probably be telling my worship leaders that, but it's better just to vent about it on your blog and not have to deal with it.

    Just sing the song as we know it!

    By Blogger Gary Underwood, at 9:15 AM, November 09, 2005  

  • You've got to be kidding me about the whole harmonization in church thing. Is it really a problem that people in church can sing a different note than you? (Yeah, I don't think the worship leader should be doing it, but that's a different story.) I don't ask you to not put graphics on your ABF worksheets, just because I can't do it. And, since we are trying to glorify god, does my effort to make the song as beautiful as possible offend Him? Or, is it possible that by withholding that, I am offending Him because I'm not offering my best?

    Just a little food for thought for the other side. :)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:11 AM, November 09, 2005  

  • Holy jones, Pastor Gary, you tell that worship leader to sing some in-tune melodies and double quick! Has the world lost its marbles?

    And Nelson, no offense, I've been victimized by crappy church harmonizers... trust me: God's offended.

    Not exactly a fair comparison to drawing in church, either. Should Josh decide to draw on his ABF worksheet, I doubt it'll make anyone around him want to jump headfirst into traffic.

    It's a community. A little give and take.

    By Blogger Jeremy Bear, at 1:36 PM, November 09, 2005  

  • Jer: for clarification on what Nelson is saying. I had taught/led an ABF for the last two years and every week I would put together a study sheet to take us through the morning. Here is a link to one of those sheets so you can see what Nelson was referring to when he says graphics. Kirsten & I have been asked by the church to lead a new ABF before the Illuminate (5:30pm) service. I’ll probably be writing about that stuff sometime in the near future.

    Nelson: I think in my attempt at humor I didn't elaborate fully what I think about the individual's role in "corporate" worship. I think you didn't get the point. It's not that someone else can do something that I can't - I respect the ability to sing well and I think it is great when people can naturally sing harmony. My issue is that it is done:

    1. Loudly &...
    2. from the congregation

    I believe, honestly, that people who can sing well have been gifted by God; it is their responsibility to use that gift. If it is wrong for a worship leader to do it, it is wrong for someone in the middle of the worship center to do it as well. If the worship leader can throw off the congregation by singing harmony, someone in the congregation, at a minimum can throw off those around them by doing the same.

    To borrow your idea about design or layout - it would be as if we we're all writing a book. Every person has the responsibility to write (worship). We've agreed upon what we're writing about (the song we're singing), we've agreed upon the typeface, layout and color scheme that we're going to put the book together with (the music style/tempo). We have also agreed what voice we'll be writing in third person (individual volume).

    Using that illustration - would it be wrong for me, as a writer to put my section in the book and use CAPITAL LETTERS, use my favorite shade of green for the text color, use a different typeface and speak in first person? Without a doubt - yes, it would be wrong.

    I could argue with everybody else that God has gifted me as a writer and for me to not write this way would mean ignoring the gift that God has blessed me with. The rest of the writers would argue, rightly so, that we've already agreed on the details and format, and that my gifts have nothing to do with the preferences I am imposing upon “my” section of the book. They could argue that if I feel contributing to the book would mean ignoring my God-given gifts, then I have the opportunity to write another book.

    My contribution to the book could still be included but, it would mean reformatting. I have the choice then to either change what I've written so it fits - for the benefit of the book as a whole; or write my own book. What I've written isn't wrong, its just that in its current state, it doesn't flow well with the rest of the book.

    In essence, people who sing harmony, or loudly are singing a different song than the rest of the congregation. Notice that I didn't include people with "bad" voices. My biggest issue in all this is the sheer volume that some people sing at. Harmony fits with the rest of the worship, but harmony from what I understand - is never louder than the main melody of a song. Harmony does take place in worship, usually - at least in the case of the illuminate service at The Chapel - by the other lead singers. This is intentional; they moderate it via microphone and mix it so its blend is proper. My whole point in this is that if you want to sing like that, volunteer to be a worship leader or sing as part of "special music". Leadership - at least in terms of corporate worship, should be from the front.

    By Blogger Josh, at 2:27 PM, November 09, 2005  

  • Holy cow Josh, this is a first. The comments are longer than the post.

    I totally agree with the smoking thing, but the old people? I guess I know what it's gonna be like in a few years for me!!! At least the old lady was by herself and didn't have to rely on one of her children go with her. OR maybe they did go with her the last time and SHE TOOK SO LONG TO WRITE HER CHECK, THEY JUST LEFT HER THERE. So she had to call a cab to get home to her cold, lonely house. Poor old lady.

    I'm not even going to touch the singing in church thing. You guys crack me up. Josh, you stirred up a hornets nest.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:22 PM, November 09, 2005  

  • Well, I had a whole thing written up, but decided to scrap it. Suffice it to say though, that I don't think the analogy of the book was brought to its logical conclusion.

    In the end, the person singing in harmony and the person who is singing the melody poorly have to have a heart that is seeking to please God.

    Happy singing to all!

    P.S. Yeah, smoking is pretty nasty. I was driving yesterday and someone flicked their cigarette out of their car and it got stuck in my windshield wiper. I was pretty pleased with that one.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:23 PM, November 09, 2005  

  • Dear Josh, Recycling? Now THAT is sweet music to MY ears...XXXOOO love from Aunt Patti

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:34 PM, November 20, 2005  

  • I guess we'll have to go back to Calvin's instrument-less church services and monophonic approach to corporate worship. What a shame, just when I was starting to get those dominant 13ths down.

    By Blogger Brian Megilligan, at 12:56 AM, December 11, 2005  

  • OK. When I first read this post I was so outraged that I wanted to hit the writer in the head with a particular, heavy, metal object. I missed the part about how he was only miffed about the people who want to make worship their own show. It seems like they are singing for an audition or think that they are going to be discovered by just going to church. I agree these people who hinder the worship experience for everyone around them, need to learn how to blend. I thought worship was for God and no other reason. I personally sing they way I would if I was in a room with God. If a song comes up where I happen to know the harmony, I will sing it but soft enough to not bother anyone. This is usually because I am a big chicken when it comes to my voice and I don't want to be heard by anyone other than Who it’s meant for. It's just me offering the best of what I am capable of to my God. I am not taking this post personal, just letting you know how I really feel. Thanks for always being honest. :)

    By Blogger Amanda K., at 11:27 AM, January 09, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home